Quick Links to Posts By Category

,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Senator Barb Goodwin - Mindless Mockery of Marriage

Senator Barb Goodwin is an embarrassment to the people of District 50, and I'm not talking about her Edith Bunker-like persona or her bargain rack at Savers wardrobe.

Any doubts that Senator Goodwin is a FOXTROT-ing idiot can be put to rest after her recent on-the-job performance documented on video below. Watch and laugh, and maybe cry. You may want to have an air-sickness bag handy before starting the video. Yes, this moron is our duly elected senator. Elections have consequences!



It's always been obvious that this woman isn't too bright, but this performance goes beyond innocent stupidity. Her mean-spirited and mocking contempt for traditional marriage and her constituents who support it is obvious, not to mention offensive.

District 50 needs and deserves better than this. Thankfully she only won a two-year term last election so District 50 voters will have the opportunity next year to correct the terrible error they made in electing this mindless DFL hack.

Labels:

4 Comments:

Blogger G-Man said...

Since before the founding of our nation, marriage has been recognized as a union between a man and a woman. Two men or two woman have never had the legal right to marry each other in Minnesota. The amendment does NOTHING to change the existing definition of marriage or the requirements for those who seek it. So how can the amendment “take away” civil rights?

If it is so reprehensible to support such a discriminatory act, then why didn't DFLers seek to overturn this act decades ago? When they owned the legislature, they had ample opportunity do away with this injustice that they call marriage. Yet, they stood quietly by and did nothing.

Moreover, if this proposed amendment to essentially ratify current law “takes away civil rights”, then shouldn't Goodwin offer an amendment of her own to do away with the current law in Minnesota?

I don't know what's worse, DFLers like Goodwin and John Marty describing this amendment as “taking away civil rights” that don't exist, or the fact that DFLers think their voters are stupid enough to buy this line of reasoning.

5/01/2011 2:20 AM  
Blogger Frank said...

Way to lead with a strong, logical argument - making fun of her appearance and clothing. After "Edith Bunker-like" I kind of tuned the rest out, though I must say that calling her a moron and the airsickness bag comment didn't really support your argument much.

Next time maybe discuss -- oh, I don't know -- an ISSUE? Try actually advancing the debate.

Kudos to G-Man; I disagree with him, but I read and respected his arguments.

5/14/2011 8:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I tend to agree with Frank. Where were you actually going with your arguemnet? Was it her clothing you were upset with?

5/19/2011 12:37 PM  
Blogger Right Hook said...

I merely stated that this woman has been an embarrassment to District 50 regarding serious matters and used the reference to emphasize that her comical persona was not what I was concerned about.

Lighten up!

5/19/2011 9:33 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

 

MOB Logo

Powered by Blogger